Skip Navigation
North Lincolnshire Council Online. Telephone 01724 296296
Advanced Search
Home | What's New | Do it online | A-Z Services | Online Maps | News | Contact Us | RSS Feeds | 9 January 2009
Advice, Benefits and Emergencies
Business
Community, People and Living
Council and Democracy
Education
Environment
Health and Wellbeing
Housing
Jobs and Careers
Leisure and Tourism
News
Social Care
Transport and Streets

Safer and Stronger Communities Scrutiny Panel - 24 September 2007

PRESENT: - Councillor Davison in the Chair.

Councillors Clark (vice-chair), Ali, Armitage, C Sherwood, Smith and Wardle.

Councillors Poole attended the meeting in accordance with Procedure Rule 37 (b).

The Panel met at Pittwood House, Scunthorpe.

1 DECLARATIONS OF PERSONAL OR PERSONAL AND PREJUDICIAL INTERESTS AND DECLARATIONS OF WHIPPING ARRANGEMENTS (IF ANY) – The following member declared a personal interest -

Member
Minute
Nature of Interest
Councillor Ali 3 Vice-Chair of a Humberside Police Sub-Group

No whip was declared.

2 PUBLIC SPEAKING – There were no requests from members of the public to address the Scrutiny Panel.

3 COMMUNITY POLICING – The Service Director – Legal and Democratic informed the meeting that since the Local Government Act 2000 introduced the executive/scrutiny split, the council has had the power to investigate community concerns beyond the council and its services. The Act says scrutiny arrangements should include the power to report ‘on matters which affect the authority’s area or the inhabitants of that area’. Many useful scrutiny reviews have been done on these wider issues. However, when this Act was passed, it required only members of the council executive and staff to respond to scrutiny activities. Scrutiny bodies could invite others to attend or provide information, but not compel them.

The Local Government White Paper, Strong and Prosperous Communities, published in October 2006 proposed a further extended role for council scrutiny in England.

Alongside this, the Police and Justice Act 2006 brings new powers to scrutinise Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships (CDRPs).

New statutory roles for scrutiny committees to look to see that crime and disorder issues are being introduced. Behind these changes lies the desire to increase the visibility and accountability of partnerships locally, as well as ensure community redress if community safety issues had not been dealt with.

Consequently, the Chair welcomed Inspector Hall and Sergeant Mckellar Main of Humberside Police to the meeting to discuss community policing. The aim of the discussion was to enable members to familiarise themselves with the work of Humberside Police in the community.

Members discussed the following aspects of community policing:

  • Relationship with HANWaG
  • Neighbourhood Policing
  • Preventative measures
  • Community engagement
  • Neighbourhood Action Teams
  • Alcohol education
  • Partnership working

Resolved – (a) That Inspector Hall and Sergeant Mckellar Main be thanked for their attendance and contribution at the meeting, and (b) that the Panel investigate further the implementation of Neighbourhood Action Teams.

4 (1) CRIME AND DISORDER REDUCTION PARTNERSHIP REFORM – OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEES AND COMMUNITY CALL FOR ACTION – The Service Director – Legal and Democratic informed the meeting that the Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership reform programme was intended to provide a framework to enable all partnerships to optimise their performance. The national minimum standards and accompanying guidance for introduction later this summer set out this framework and had been the subject of extensive consultation with stakeholders and practitioners over the last year.

An important part of this framework was effective delivery structures and improved accountability of partnerships to their communities. The provisions for crime and disorder Overview and Scrutiny Committees (OSC) and Community Calls for Action (CCA) for crime and disorder matters in the Police and Justice Act 2006 were part of the means of achieving that accountability.

Local accountability and local involvement in policing were also going to be reviewed by Sir Ronnie Flanagan as part of his broader review of policing, announced by the Home Secretary in April this year. While not explicitly reviewing the role of partnerships or the potential role of OSC/CCA, the review had at its core the same aims of improving accountability and local involvement. In view of this, and the need to consider the response to any recommendations coming from the review, Home Office ministers have decided to pause with policy development on crime and disorder OSC and CCA. They remain committed to enhancing local accountability arrangements for policing and crime, but believe that pausing on the implementation enabled them to reflect the findings and recommendations of the Sir Ronnie’s Review in policy on OSC and CCA.

Sir Ronnie’s Review of policing is not due to report until the end of the year.

Resolved – That the Service Director – Legal and Democratic update the Panel once Sir Ronnie Flanagan has published his broader review of policing report.

5 (2) REVIEW OF SAFER NEIGHBOURHOODS – The Service Director – Legal and Democratic informed members of the outcomes of the review of Safer Neighbourhoods.

On 21 March 2007 the Safer Neighbourhoods Board agreed on a review of Safer Neighbourhoods. The purpose was to assess the most effective arrangements for the range of strategic and operational functions that support the safer neighbourhoods partnership.

On 24 April 2007 the Board received a report on new National Standards for Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships (CDRPs). Further Home Office guidance was received on 18 June 2007. CDRPs must comply with these new standards by 1 April 2008.

Consequently, an action plan had been prepared to enable the Safer Neighbourhoods Partnership to achieve National Standards for the working of CDRPs.

Members then engaged in a discussion on the action plan to achieve National Standards for the working of CDRPs.

Resolved – That the action plan be re-visited by this Panel in six months time.

6 HUMBERSIDE POLICE DIVISIONAL PERFORMANCE CHALLENGE DAY – The Service Director – Legal and Democratic requested feedback from the Panel on their attendance at the Humberside Police Divisional Performance Challenge Day held on 24 September 2007.

Resolved – (a) That the Service Director – Legal and Democratic write to Acting Divisional Commander Hilditch thanking Humberside Police for their invitation to the Humberside Police Divisional Performance Challenge Day, and (b) that the Service Director – Legal and Democratic write to Chief Superintendent Donald to congratulate him on his recent promotion.

7 HUMBERSIDE POLICE FAMILIARISATION VISITS – The Service Director – Legal and Democratic informed members of the itinerary for the Humberside Police Familiarisation Visits on 8 and 9 October 2007.

8 OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY AND THE SAFER NEIGHBOURHOODS PARTNERSHIP WORKSHOP - The Service Director – Legal and Democratic informed members that the overview and scrutiny and the Safer Neighbourhoods Partnership workshop originally planned for this meeting would now be held on Monday 22 October 2007.

All members of the Safer Neighbourhoods Partnership had been invited to attend to discuss enhancing the relationship between the two organisations.

9 (3) LEADER OF THE COUNCIL’S FORWARD PLAN – OCTOBER 2007 TO JANUARY 2008 - The Service Director - Legal and Democratic circulated the Leader of North Lincolnshire Council's Forward Plan for October 2007 to January 2008.

The plan contained details of all matters and issues likely to be the subject of key decisions for a period of the next four months, updated on a monthly basis.

The Panel then engaged in a discussion on the content of the Leader of the Council's Forward Plan for October 2007 to January 2008.

Resolved – That the Leader of the Council's Forward Plan for October 2007 to January 2008 be noted.

10 ADDED ITEM – There was no added item for discussion at this meeting.


© 2006 North Lincolnshire Council | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Website Statistics | Accessibility |